</s>104-10117-10357 A3035 NEW YORK TIMES THE NEW YORK TIMESS SATURDAY, MARCH 15, 1969 NEW YORK TIMES THE New YORK TIMS. SATURDAY, MARC 13, 1969 Garrison Says Evidence Rules Cost Him Verdict 1-5 MAR-65-Says Evidence Rules Costs Cost Him. Verdict NEW ORLEANS, March 1, The witness calls for Kennedy killed to preserve it. (UP) Jim Garrison, the Dis- that she was conspiracy would be perjury. He has also exposed theories (UP] Jim Garrison. The Dis- that he had "solved" the assassination that she may not be able to defend him. He also spoke to him. the President Kennedy, says that he may not have any of the following statements. the show conspiracy would he has also expressed theories of the President Kennedy's sayings Garrison was under oath when he was his father, Mr. Kennedy, and he has been involved in the mill- because he was forced to bond a. Ferrie or Harvey to kill. He had been engaged in Mr. Kennedy's the death of his son. He would have a. Mr. Orland or Orland's death. He was engaged in the death of Mr. W. Kennedy's because he has forced to Bond a. Fernie or Harvey To- a. W . Ferrie and Harvey to- fail bound by hand-rules. a. A. Orlando orlando's death, he would have the trial bound by rules. a. Orleans orlando orland's trial that he would be in the court of Dr. Martin. with pipe in hand, his elder Oswald or Mr. Terrie in court court of originant. the trial trial last night. Since the trial was held by him. the trial began to be held in the same where the trial last week. Since on Mr. Garrison conceived, how. Mr . Garrison said that Mr. Garrison said that he were television last night, the on Mr ., Orland was not able to see the trial being held by the Rev. Dr. Martin. television station. He on Mr .. Garrison said to be seated in the jury. He did not have about the trial to be defeated by the same "mode" of about" to be able. He said "The trial was not yet yet." because he had not intended to about" he was not interested in the case of the the jury had not intend to about" by the trial trial. Debuted by Mr. Garrisson, he stated "Mr. Garrison" in the matter that the jury decided. <loc_272><loc_511><loc_272><loc_522><loc_69><loc_520>Mr. Garrisson said that the trial ruled the rule. He originated in Orleans was <loc_480><loc_508>the jury believed that he had been denied no The jury decided no orator that he was the trial evidence he was

Summary: The text contains a fragmented and corrupted newspaper article from *The New York Times* dated March 13, 1969, discussing Jim Garrison’s legal proceedings in New Orleans related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. It references Garrison’s claims about conspiracy theories, his interactions with witnesses, and the challenges he faced during a trial involving alleged involvement of figures like Lee Harvey Oswald, A. Ferrie, and others. The text includes disjointed statements about legal procedures, jury deliberations, and Garrison’s assertions regarding evidence and perjury. Mentions of "Dr. Martin" or "Rev. Dr. Martin" appear in the context of a trial but are not clearly linked to Martin Luther King Jr. or his assassination.  

Key People: Jim Garrison (attorney and investigator), Lee Harvey Oswald, A. Ferrie, Mr. Orland, Rev. Dr. Martin (possibly a witness or figure in the trial).  
Key Locations: New Orleans, Louisiana.  
Key Events: Legal proceedings related to JFK’s assassination, jury deliberations, allegations of conspiracy and perjury.  
Key Organizations: None explicitly mentioned.

MLK Declassified Files

00435483_garrison_says_evidence_ru_104-10117-10357.pdf

Document Summary

Try AI Search