</s>104-10129-10350 JFK ACT RELEASE NEW YORK TIMES - 4 may- RELEASE NO OBJECTION TO ASSOCIATION ADOOR SUSICATION ADORENT 7. Freed of Contempt-in-Trial of Ray By MARTIN WALDRON Volators with a record created Judge Faquin wiped the rec. MEMPHIS, May 23, 2013 after the necessity of such such as "Judge Faquinn" and "and clean today. He granted, MEMPIRE, May 25, 2013. of two of those cited by judge or judge for the seven- test of the extent of a judge's of the extent to a judge? of the court's duty by judge for a new trial for the seventh- of a court case. The court case has been granted, MEMPHA, May 29, 2013, of a jury of the court case for a trial of the seven. men and then dismissed the jolly was avoided court dismisses paper reporters who had had writ. of the Criminal Court dismisses. of the jury's former attorney. A. "Two of these cases filed for the new record that the Criminal Court dismissed. of the trial of a jury's reported attorney, "A. "The left left to record that ing the trial did not dismisses" of a trial. The jury said that the jury did not have any evidence in the case, "The jury said, "In which Howard Memphis" "Those who had been found in the late judge, "Preston, "W.W. Howard Both Memphis" A. of the Jury, "Wilch Howard Both Memphis" A." "The judge said that he had found the trial was not guilty of the case. "In the case of the trial, "I did not do not have a case of of the Rev. Martin W. Preston, "With both Memphis' A." of the judge, W.W." said "The court case was not a case for the court of the defendant." of the defendant. "I said "In this case, I said "A" said "No" said that "The case of a case" sons in contempt, of one of them will appear to be possible to try to determine of the plaintiff's case, the judge's case for of the defendants' case, and "The defendant's case." of the case." "In court case, said "I am not guilty to the defendant" of the Court case for "The Court case" and said "Judge Faquin" of the prosecution of the jury, "Judges case" for "the jury" the jury's case of "The trial of "the defendant" and the jury case" the jury said "the case of trial" <loc_219><loc_503>The case and present dan Sheppard and "Cleveland, who of Investigation" of the Shelly-County. the jury did "The Case and present dans" of "Shepard and "Who of Investigation."

Summary: The text appears to be a fragmented and incoherent collection of legal proceedings, court-related terminology, and possibly misrendered or corrupted document entries. It references dates between May 23-29, 2013, in Memphis, involving judicial actions such as dismissals of cases, jury-related matters, and mentions of judges (e.g., "Judge Faquin"). Names like "Rev. Martin W. Preston," "W.W. Howard Both Memphis," and "A." are cited in legal contexts, though their relevance to the MLK assassination investigation is unclear. The text includes references to "Cleveland, who of Investigation" and "Shelly-County," but these do not directly connect to known historical records or official investigations into MLK's assassination. The content contains repeated phrases about court cases, dismissals, and legal terminology, suggesting it may be a misformatted or incomplete document.

Key People: Rev. Martin W. Preston, W.W. Howard Both Memphis, A., Judge Faquin  
Key Locations: Memphis, Shelly-County, Cleveland  
Key Events: Legal proceedings involving court dismissals, jury-related cases, judicial rulings on contempt and trials  
Key Organizations: Criminal Court, unspecified investigative entities (e.g., "Investigation")

MLK Declassified Files

00459887_7_freed_of_contempt_in_tr_104-10129-10350.pdf

Document Summary

Try AI Search