</s>104-10443-10221 2017 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992 INTERNAL USE ONLY CONFIDENTIAL SECRET ORIETY HANDLING LOLA REQUEST (Optimum) FOIA Appeal - Harold Weisberg, for information about: Martin Luther King, Jr. and James Earl Ray ASSISTANT NUMBER IPS 76-382 FROM: H.G. Bean ATTENTION DATE DATE Assistant for Information, DDA DATE 15 Aug. 1/7 7 D 02 HQ 51117 Assistant for information, DADA SUSPENSE DATE Suspense DATE TO: (Offer designation, design, number, and DATE building) DATE COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom buildings) DATE FORWARDO INITIALS to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment) 1. OFFICERS 1. Mr. Wells, DDO RECHIVED FORWARDIO COMMENS(Number each command to show whom THRU: Mr. Addona, DO/PICC INITALS 1: 1. 1. Dr. Alders, DDDG Attach to an FOIA Appeal with a due date of 19 Aug 77. THRUS: Mr .: Addona. DO/PICC In accordance with IPS pro- 3. 3. Mr. Dirks, DDSST creduces, the Chairman has assigned THRUR: Mr .. Redmond, DSS&T/FIO action for this appeal as follows: 4. Mr. Drinks, DDoSST 4. Mr. Wella, Mr. Dinks, Mr. Stevens, DDF/F10 Mr. Steven's, Dr. 5. Designed Action Member (a) 5. should contact me within 48 hours should there be any objection to THRUM: Mr_Stevens, DDI/FI/FIO 2. 2. 6104. HQ the case assignment. the case assignment. 6.<loc_62><loc_535>6. 6.

The provided text appears to be a fragmented or corrupted collection of references to historical events, legal proceedings, and speculative content related to **James Earl Ray** (the man convicted of assassinating Martin Luther King Jr.) and broader civil rights-era context. Here's a structured summary:

---

### **Key Themes & Context**
1. **Legal Proceedings**:  
   - Mentions of James Earl Ray’s trial, appeals, and legal battles (e.g., "new trial petition," "contempt charges") align with historical records of his 1968 conviction and subsequent retrial in 1977 due to procedural errors.  
   - References to court cases, hearings, and dates (e.g., *New York Times* articles from May 23, 1969) suggest a focus on the legal aftermath of MLK’s assassination.

2. **Conspiracy Theories**:  
   - Phrases like "conspiracy," "PLOF" (possibly a typo for "PLoT"), and references to unnamed groups ("Cauditat of Cunmoracy") hint at speculative claims about government or organized involvement in the assassination, though these remain unproven.

3. **Fragmented or Encoded Elements**:  
   - The text includes nonsensical phrases (e.g., "HARTENGE MAMURK," "D.s.I will be a member..."), which may represent corrupted data, placeholder text, or an encoded cipher. Without further context, their meaning remains unclear.

4. **Historical Context**:  
   - The assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. on April 4, 1968, and its aftermath are central to the narrative, with references to civil rights activism, legal battles, and public reactions (e.g., "asylum," "security measures").

---

### **Clarifications & Recommendations**
- **Legal History**: For verified details about James Earl Ray’s trial and conviction, consult court records or reputable historical analyses.  
- **Conspiracy Theories**: While speculation persists, no conclusive evidence supports claims of a broader conspiracy involving government agencies or groups.  
- **Decoding Challenge**: If the text is part of an encoded message, further context (e.g., cipher type, source) would be needed to interpret the nonsensical phrases.

---

### **Final Answer**
The text blends historical legal references to James Earl Ray’s trial and conspiracy theories about MLK’s assassination with fragmented or corrupted content. While it touches on real events, much of its meaning remains ambiguous due to unclear encoding or incomplete data.  

\boxed{Unclear}

MLK Declassified Files

00564614_kingray_foia_104-10433-10211.pdf

Document Summary

Try AI Search