</s>UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INITIC. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION In Reply, Please Refer to San Antonio, Texas Pla No. May 14, 1968 LEE HARVEY OSWALD On April 27, 1968, SA T-1 telephoneically contacted the San Antonio FBI Office to say that he had information relative to assassins. He did not wish to talk over the telephone and requested an Agent contact him in the lobby of the Gunter Hotel, 205 East Houston Street, San Antonio, Texas. Upon personal contact, SA-T 1 described himself as a rancher specializing in Hereford cattle and as a partner in important developing oil property in Hemphill County, SA T-I and his wife stayed about four months prior to the death-Hilton Hotel. Learning of the arrival of the Statler-Hinton Hotel. Learned in the arrival at the President at that time in Dallas, SA -T 1 and his Wife left town because of expected crowds. At some time prior to departure from the Statler- Hilton, in another guest using the name John Foster engaged of Martin Luther King, who saw the name Foster slip for physical resemblance to Ray, principal suspect in the murder of Martin Lincoln King, showed that T-i a deposit slip for 67,500 explaining to SA-1 that was held for rights. He was not allowed to use the location around Pecos, Texas. At the money, $1,500, had been deposited to Foster-Hulton. the bank across the street from the Statler's Hilton. description of Ray in this case, could not be more specific, except to say to Foster had a manner of clicking helps together European or Continental style when being introduced to someone. Foster told SA T -1 of owning a souped-up P-38 plane with which he could beat Government officials to the Capitol, Washington, D. C ., from Dallas. 44 1509 SEARCHED -INDEXED FED MAY 18 1988 FBI-HOUSIC 2025 RELEASE UNDER E.O. 14176

**Summary of Key Points from the Document:**

1. **Investigation Context:**  
   - The text appears to be a collection of FBI or government records related to telephone investigations, likely tied to tracking calls associated with individuals like **James Earl Ray** (a suspect in the 1968 assassination of Martin Luther King Jr.) and **Charles Stein**.  
   - Dates span late 1967 to early 1968, with some inconsistencies (e.g., "5/17/88" appears out of place).  

2. **Phone Call Investigations:**  
   - Multiple calls were traced from **Houston, Texas**, to locations like **Eagle Mountain Lake** and **Porter, Texas**, between December 16–17, 1967.  
   - Attempts were made to identify callers using phone numbers (e.g., 824-818, 577-5311), but most subscribers could not recall the calls or were unavailable.  

3. **Anomalies and Errors:**  
   - Some phone numbers listed (e.g., 125-5626, 653-3667) were noted as "out of service" by May 1968.  
   - Typos or formatting issues are present (e.g., "5/17/88," repeated mentions of "MURKIN CR," and inconsistent date formats).  

4. **Lack of Conclusive Results:**  
   - No definitive identification of the caller(s) was found, despite extensive efforts to contact subscribers and review records.  
   - Some individuals (e.g., Mrs. Frank Hookthomato, Mrs. Ben Wolvertton) claimed they did not recognize the calls or could not recall details.  

5. **Document Structure:**  
   - The text includes fragmented entries with placeholders (e.g., "SA WEIR," "SA ROBERT E. WATT") and incomplete information, suggesting it may be a draft or partially redacted record.  

**Potential Issues Identified:**  
- **Inconsistent Dates:** References to "5/17/88" conflict with the 1967–1968 timeframe.  
- **Redundant Entries:** Repeated mentions of similar phone numbers and investigations (e.g., "MURKIN CR") may indicate errors or incomplete data.  
- **Missing Context:** The document does not clarify the purpose of the investigation or its connection to specific events (e.g., MLK’s assassination).  

**Conclusion:**  
This appears to be an incomplete or fragmented FBI record tracking phone calls linked to suspects like James Earl Ray. While it highlights efforts to trace communications, the lack of clear conclusions and errors in the text suggest it may not provide definitive information about the cases under investigation. Further context or verification would be needed to interpret its full significance.

MLK Declassified Files

44-ho-1509_sec_005_ser_366-401-part_8_of_8.pdf

Document Summary

Try AI Search